Nyambok: Academic blogging: Issues and Challenges

Yesterday I attended a symposium on academic blogging in Trinity College Dublin organised by the collective who produce Pue's Occurrences. My own contribution concerned the Ireland After NAMA blog (other blogs represented are listed below). It was fascinating to listen to the experiences of other academic bloggers and the kinds of issues and challenges that they face through blogging. I thought it might be useful to share those challenges with a non-academic audience (I've put up a very similar post on Ireland After NAMA given the completely different constituencies of the two blogs), so below is a basic summary. I'm sure many of these issues will resonate with non-academic bloggers as well.

Sustainability

feeding the monster - need to post regularly to build and maintain a reader base
voluntarism – relies on voluntary labour and enthusiasm of posters
in collective blogs, getting people to contribute - people are busy; but also a lack of confidence in the credibility of the media

Academic credibility

some contributors worried about wasting work by publishing it through a media that presently lacks sufficient academic and institutional credibility and legitimacy

Building a readership/community

how to implement successful strategies to develop a readership base
building trust and relationship with readers; building a community

Relationship between individual creative/academic freedom and institutional control and oversight

to what extent does a blog represent institution? What level of control do they/should they have over it?
To what extent are blogs experimental thought spaces for ideas and analysis as opposed to formal spaces of reporting/commentary (does it have to have the same levels of rigour and validity as that written in a journal?)

Different way of working

a blog can drive a research agenda and not the other way
blogging is often a process of doing and publishing research in a just in time fashion

Different way of writing/communicating

shorter pieces in a much more journalistic style; lacks usual academic conventions
making ideas and writing open and accessible

Editorial policy

for collective blogs - is there a need for an editorial policy or control? Or a writer’s/reader’s charter? What happens if people post material that is inappropriate or badly written? Who takes editorial control? On what basis?

Funding

for design, maintenance and content, for subscriptions or servers, for events, etc

Media interest

what happens if a post goes viral and the media get interested? It can be a lot of pressure and can take up a lot of time

Dealing with negative feedback/abuse

vested interests do not necessarily like what you have to say and can react, sometimes not through public debate by private means; how to deal with this?

Dealing with the public

dealing with comments in a timely and informative manner; being prepared to engage beyond the initial posting.
how to deal with people who ask you to do work on their pet projects
discussion of work on other social media such as bulletin boards – do you engage? What happens when the material gets misinterpreted?

Dealing with conflicts of interest

how to deal with posts on topics or expressing views that conflict with or undermine funders of the blogger's research (or someone else's in the collective)

Dealing with data issues